Source: libmessage-passing-zeromq-perl Maintainer: Debian Perl Group Uploaders: Jonas Smedegaard , Section: perl Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl Priority: optional Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), dh-buildinfo, Build-Depends-Indep: libanyevent-perl , libfile-pushd-perl , libjson-perl , libmessage-passing-perl , libmodule-install-perl, libmoo-perl , libmoox-types-mooselike-perl , libnamespace-clean-perl , libposix-atfork-perl , libsub-name-perl , libtask-weaken-perl , libtest-simple-perl , libtry-tiny-perl , libzmq-ffi-perl , perl, Standards-Version: 4.6.0 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libmessage-passing-zeromq-perl Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libmessage-passing-zeromq-perl.git Homepage: https://metacpan.org/release/Message-Passing-ZeroMQ Package: libmessage-passing-zeromq-perl Architecture: all Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, libanyevent-perl, libfile-pushd-perl, libmessage-passing-perl, libmoo-perl, libmoox-types-mooselike-perl, libnamespace-clean-perl, libposix-atfork-perl, libsub-name-perl, libtask-weaken-perl, libtry-tiny-perl, libzmq-ffi-perl, Description: input and output messages to ZeroMQ Message::Passing::ZeroMQ is a ZeroMQ transport for Message::Passing. . Designed for use as a log transport and aggregation mechanism for perl applications, allowing you to aggregate structured and non-structured log messages across the network in a non-blocking manner. . Clients (i.e. users of the Message::Passing::Output::ZeroMQ class) connect to a server (i.e. a user of the Message::Passing::Input::ZeroMQ class) via ZeroMQ's pub/sub sockets. These are setup to be lossy and non-blocking, meaning that if the log-receiver process is down or slow, then the application will queue a small (and configurable) amount of logs on its side, and after that log messages will be dropped. . Whilst throwing away log messages isn't a good thing to do, or something that you want to happen regularly, in many (especially web application) contexts, network logging being a single point of failure is not acceptable from a reliability and graceful degradation standpoint. . The application grinding to a halt as a non-essential centralised resource is unavailable (e.g. the log aggregation server) is significantly less acceptable than the loss of non-essential logging data.